2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matthew Fullen v. Commissioner Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matthew Fullen v. Commissioner Social Security Anchor | green | “in this case, like jones, the alj's decision, read as a whole, illustrates that the alj's conclusion that fullen did not meet the requirements for any listing . . . was supported by substantial evidence.” | 6 |
| 2 | Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | green | “the alj's decision, read as a whole, illustrates that the alj considered the appropriate factors in reaching the conclusion that did not meet the requirements for any listing” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.