4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Panama City v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panama City v. State Anchor | green | “the development of the law in this state on this question and particularly a study of the legislative history with relation to public projects of a recreational and entertainment nature reveals the allowance to the public bodies of an extremely wide latitude in this field.” | 4 |
| 2 | Islamorada, Village of Islands v. Higgs | green | “ad valorem tax exemption when the marina serves both residents and nonresidents, despite (1) operating in competition with other marinas in the area and (2) generating a profit for the municipality.” | 3 |
| 3 | Islamorada, Village of Islands v. Higgs | green | “is a recreational facility that is available to residents and nonresidents and is operated without the involvement of a non-governmental lessee or operator.” | 3 |
| 4 | Fla. Dept. of Rev. v. City of Gainesville | green | “a separate and more restrictive test” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.