3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Julian R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Julian R. Anchor | green | “significant differences between the juvenile and adult offender laws underscore their different goals: the former seeks to rehabilitate, while the latter seeks to punish.” | 7 |
| 2 | Manduley v. Superior Court | green | “proposition 21 revised the juvenile court law to broaden the circumstances in which minors 14 years of age and older can be prosecuted in the criminal division of the superior court, rather than in juvenile court. the initiative, authorized specified charges against certain mino…” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Cervantes | green | “the supreme court has limited estrada to statutory changes that mitigate the penalty for a particular offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.