3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Chemical Lime, Ltd. Anchor | green | “as it happened, the authority began operations the day we issued our opinion and thus became effective.” | 3 |
| 2 | The Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. Burrell Day and Joel McDaniel | green | “government cannot immunize itself from its constitutional duty to provide adequate compensation for property taken through a regulatory scheme merely by discouraging investment” | 3 |
| 3 | Ellwest Stereo Theatres of Memphis, Inc. v. United States | green | “courts have traditionally looked to the existing use of property as a basis for determining the extent of interference with the owner's 'primary expectation concerning the use of the parcel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.