3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Reyes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Reyes Anchor | green | “consequently, any issues that were decided on direct appeal are res judicata, and any issues that could have been presented on direct appeal, but were not, are forfeited.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Kane | green | “change the result on retrial, particularly given that the jury's consideration of the possibility that someone named strickland committed the offense.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Brown | green | “affidavits containing hearsay are insufficient to support a claim under the act.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.