2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Dar. H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Dar. H. Anchor | green | “when the opposite conclusion is clearly apparent.” | 8 |
| 2 | In Re D.F. | green | “must not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court regarding the credibility of witnesses, the weight to be given to the evidence, or the inferences to be drawn.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.