3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Marriage of O'Brien.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Marriage of O'Brien Anchor | green | “recusal and substitution for cause are not the same thing.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re Marriage of O'Brien | green | “rule 63(c)(1)'s direction to judges to voluntarily recuse themselves where their 'impartiality might reasonably be questioned' includes 'situations involving the appearance of impropriety.” | 5 |
| 3 | Kamelgard v. American College of Surgeons | green | “unlike a motion for substitution of judge, a motion for recusal does not trigger a duty on the part of the trial judge to transfer the motion to another judge for determination.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.