4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fox Islands Wind Neighbors v. Department of Environmental Protection.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fox Islands Wind Neighbors v. Department of Environmental Protection Anchor | green | “generally, in rule 80c appeals, a remand from the superior court to an executive agency for additional decision-making is not a final judgment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Forest Ecology Network v. Land Use Regulation Commission | green | “the requirement of a final judgment for appellate review, although not jurisdictional, is a long-standing prudential rule .,, intended to avoid piecemeal appeals and to promote the efficient and effective resolution of legal disputes.” | 3 |
| 3 | Malonson v. Town of Berwick | green | “on rare occasions we have taken direct appeals of remand orders when the remaining action is essentially ministerial, such as the formal issuance of a permit,” | 3 |
| 4 | Susan E. Bryant v. Town of Camden | green | “that fully decide and dispose of the whole cause leaving no further questions for ... future consideration and judgment by the administrative agency.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.