3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Diaz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Diaz Anchor | green | “in interpreting a statute, we must accept the general assembly's choice of language and not add or imply words that simply are not there.” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Benavidez | green | “we must accept the general assembly's choice of language and not add or imply words that simply are not there.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Benavidez | green | “in interpreting a statute, we must accept the general assembly's choice of language and not add or imply words that simply are not there.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.