3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Weil.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Weil Anchor | green | “drawing on the diverse backgrounds of its members, the parole board makes 'highly predictive and individualized discretionary appraisals.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re Weil | green | “highly predictive and individualized discretionary appraisals.” | 5 |
| 3 | Basim Hobson v. New Jersey State Parole Board | green | “with due regard to the opportunity of the one who heard the witnesses to judge of their credibility.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.