3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle Anchor | green | “bona fide physician-patient relationship” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Anderson | green | “the evidence de novo to determine whether the trial court properly granted or denied the defendant's motion to dismiss under 8.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Anderson | green | “trial court may not weigh the evidence, assess credibility, or resolve factual disputes at the hearing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.