2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Church of Our Lord & Savior Jesus Christ v. City of Markham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Church of Our Lord & Savior Jesus Christ v. City of Markham Anchor | green | “the ripeness doctrine arises out of the constitution's case-or-controversy requirement, as claims premised on uncertain or contingent events present justiciability problems.” | 8 |
| 2 | Citizens for Appropriate Rural v. Anthony Foxx | green | “a claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or that may not occur at all.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.