3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of New York Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Wells Fargo National Bank, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of New York Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Wells Fargo National Bank, N.A. Anchor | green | “a state-law claim 'necessarily' raises federal questions where the claim is affirmatively 'premised' on a violation of federal law.” | 7 |
| 2 | Varga v. McGraw Hill Financial, Inc. | green | “all four requirements must be satisfied in order for a federal court to have jurisdiction.” | 3 |
| 3 | Mihok v. Medtronic, Inc. | green | “to aid courts in identifying the 'extremely rare exceptions' comprising this group, the supreme court has fastened a four-part test.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.