3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Welfare of M.R.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Welfare of M.R.H. Anchor | green | “must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence from which a rational trier of fact could find the necessary facts by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.” | 6 |
| 2 | In re the Welfare of C.S. | green | “a service is 'necessary' if it is needed to address a condition that precludes reunification of the parent and child.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re the Termination of: IM.- M. & Z.M. - M. | green | “all necessary services, reasonably available, capable of correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable future.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.