2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United States Anchor | green | “if it is just as likely that the sentencing court relied on the elements or enumerated offenses clause, solely or as an alternative basis for the enhancement, then the movant has failed to show that his enhancement was due to use of the residual clause.” | 9 |
| 2 | Jerome Julius Weeks v. United States | green | “it is necessary in such a case to look to the record and binding precedent through the time of direct appeal to determine whether the claimant has shown 'that-more likely than not-it was use of the residual clause that led to the ... enhancement of his sentence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.