4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Ortiz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Ortiz Anchor | green | “the conduct of his defense was in fact affected by the operation of the conflict of interest, or that the conflict operated on the representation” | 5 |
| 2 | People of State of New York v. Grega | green | “an indictment may not be amended in any respect which changes the theory or theories of the prosecution as reflected in the evidence before the grand jury which filed it” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Green | green | “resulted in an impermissible substantive change in the indictments by adding new counts that changed the theory of the prosecution” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Ortiz | green | “defendant must show that the conduct of his defense was in fact affected by the operation of the conflict of interest, or that the conflict operated on the representation” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.