2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Alfred P..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Alfred P. Anchor | green | “the doctrine of res judicata precludes the litigation in a later case of matters actually litigated, and matters that could have been litigated, in an earlier action between the same parties for the same cause of action.” | 8 |
| 2 | ERG, Inc. v. Barnes | green | “the term 'cause of action' embraces all theories on which relief could be claimed arising out of the same factual transaction.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.