7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 103 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7 Anchor | green | “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 78 |
| 2 | Sharif Pharmacy Inc. v. Prime Therapeutics LLC | green | “a 'relevant market' under the sherman act is comprised of the 'commodities reasonably interchangeable by consumers for the same purposes.” | 5 |
| 3 | Associated Milk Dealers, Inc. v. Milk Drivers Union, Local 753, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America | green | “proof of predatory purpose as a prerequisite to finding that a most favored nation clause violates the antitrust laws” | 4 |
| 4 | Blue Cross & Blue Shield United Of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic | green | “are standard devices by which buyers try to bargain for low prices, by getting the seller to agree to treat them as favorably as any of their other customers.” | 4 |
| 5 | Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. | green | “this extensive, expensive litigation seems to have been initiated largely in response to a perceived threat to fair isaac's dominant position in the credit scoring industry.” | 4 |
| 6 | Viamedia, Incorporation v. Comcast Corporation | green | “must allege and prove harm, not just to a single competitor, but to the competitive process, i.e., to competition itself” | 4 |
| 7 | Sharif Pharmacy Inc. v. Prime Therapeutics LLC | green | “where plaintiffs fail to identify any facts from which the court can infer that defendants had sufficient market power to have been able to create a monopoly, their 2 claim may be properly dismissed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.