3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from M.K. v. Tenet.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.K. v. Tenet Anchor | green | “to promote trial convenience and expedite the final resolution of disputes, thereby preventing multiple lawsuits, extra expense to the parties, and loss of time to the court as well as the litigants appearing before it.” | 5 |
| 2 | Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board | green | “it is well-settled that parties are misjoined when the preconditions of permissive joinder set forth in rule 20(a) have not been satisfied.” | 5 |
| 3 | M.K. v. Tenet | green | “the purpose of rule 20 is to promote trial convenience and expedite the final resolution of disputes, thereby preventing multiple lawsuits, extra expense to the parties, and loss of time to the court as well as the litigants appearing before it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.