2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif Anchor | green | “nothing in the constitution requires that consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy court be express.” | 9 |
| 2 | Ojeda v. Goldberg | green | “because the statute provides that an extension is non-dischargeable 'to the extent' that it is obtained by a false representation, the question for us is what portion of the forbearance is directly attributable to the false representation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.