3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nkacoang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nkacoang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “if an applicant is unable to meet the 'well-founded fear' standard for asylum, he is generally precluded from qualifying for either asylum or withholding of deportation.” | 6 |
| 2 | Lorisme v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “no basis for believing that the haitian government has any interest in him today, eight years after the supposed arrest” | 3 |
| 3 | Hardev Singh v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “we have recognized that where there was a danger of persecution in a single village from guerrillas who knew the petitioner, and no showing of such danger elsewhere in the country, the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for asylum” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.