3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gosa v. Mayden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gosa v. Mayden Anchor | green | “one of the most basic principles of our jurisprudence is that subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred upon a court by consent of the parties.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re the Arbitration of Certain Controversies Between Chromalloy Aeroservices & Arab Republic of Egypt | green | “award was made in egypt, under the laws of egypt, and had been nullified by a court designated by egypt to review arbitral awards.” | 3 |
| 3 | LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. | green | “manifest disregard of the law,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.