3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. James.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. James Anchor | green | “we assume that the legislative purpose is expressed by the ordinary meaning of the words used.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States of America, Ex Rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. The Prudential Insurance Company | green | “disclosure of discovery material to a party who is not under any court imposed limitation as to its use is a public disclosure under the fca.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States of America and Eunice Mathews v. Bank of Farmington | green | “if the public disclosure from which the information is actually derived is essential to a qui tam claim” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.