3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boroian v. Mueller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boroian v. Mueller Anchor | green | “not equivalent to a probability requirement, the plausibility standard asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully.” | 6 |
| 2 | Dixon v. Shamrock Financial Corp. | green | “complaint's allegations that soto-torres was 'illegally and unreasonably detained' and that 'excessive force' was used in pushing him to the floor are legal conclusions that are not to be credited” | 3 |
| 3 | Soto-Torres v. Fraticelli | green | “complaint's allegations that soto-torres was 'illegally and unreasonably detained' and that 'excessive force' was used in pushing him to the floor are legal conclusions that are not to be credited” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.