3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Landrum v. Mitchell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Landrum v. Mitchell Anchor | green | “cumulative mitigation evidence” | 4 |
| 2 | Goodwin v. Johnson | green | “different from and much stronger than the evidence presented on direct appeal,” | 4 |
| 3 | Morales v. Mitchell | green | “the volume and compelling nature of the new evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.