4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shlensky v. Dorsey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shlensky v. Dorsey Anchor | green | “is the extent of the benefit to be derived from the proposed settlement by the corporation, the real party in interest.” | 3 |
| 2 | Shlensky v. Dorsey | green | “the principal factor to be considered in determining the fairness of a settlement concluding a shareholders' derivative action is the extent of the benefit to be derived from the proposed settlement by the corporation, the real party in interest.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Bolger | green | “nonparty shareholders must be given notice of a proposed settlement of a shareholder's derivative action.” | 3 |
| 4 | In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litigation | green | “addresses whether defendants could withstand a monetary judgment for an amount significantly greater than the proposed settlement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.