3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 102 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Felipe Verduzco v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Felipe Verduzco v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “may not substitute its judgment for that of the commissioner.” | 83 |
| 2 | Donald M. Rhinehart v. Robert H. Rinch, Etc. (Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) | green | “to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which . . . has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.” | 13 |
| 3 | Holzberg v. Astrue | green | “the alj need not cite the specific record as long as 'arguably germane reasons' for dismissing the testimony are noted, even though the alj does 'not clearly link his determination to those reasons,' and substantial evidence supports the alj's decision.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.