4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jose Antonio Herrera.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jose Antonio Herrera Anchor | green | “given the district court's express reliance on the government's analysis of the offense contained in the presentence report, any error committed by referring to a codefendant's sentencing hearing was harmless at best.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. William L. Bauer | green | “the requirement to articulate specific findings may be satisfied by adopting the findings contained in the psr.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. David Heredia-Holguin | green | “a term of supervised release could have a 'deterrent' effect” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Michael Clark | green | “the government is able to show that the error did not affect the district court's selection of the sentence imposed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.