4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Goines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Goines Anchor | green | “ruled with the proverbial iron fist through intimidation.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Danny Harmon | green | “his guidelines range was the same-360 months to life- whether he was in criminal history category i or ii” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Demond Glover | green | “had the district court relied on the career offender status when choosing the appropriate sentence, the error would not have been harm- less even though the guideline range would have been the same.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Demond Glover | green | “since the parties do not dispute the error, we need only address whether the error is harmless.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.