3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,812 Jackie Tipton v. Michelin Tire Company, Kelsey-Hayes Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,812 Jackie Tipton v. Michelin Tire Company, Kelsey-Hayes Company Anchor | green | “negligence and strict liability theories of recovery overlap to the degree that, in either instance, the plaintiff must prove the product was defective and the legal cause of the injury.” | 4 |
| 2 | Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough Ex Rel. McCullough | green | “that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture” | 4 |
| 3 | Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough Ex Rel. McCullough | green | “the ultimate question is whether the product creates 'such a risk' of an accident of the general nature of the one in question 'that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture' of such a product 'would not have put it on the market.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.