3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Beinhauer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Beinhauer Anchor | green | “make a reasonable inquiry as to the circumstances giving rise to the bankruptcy petition and all facts asserted therein.” | 5 |
| 2 | In the Matter Of: Peter Francis Geraci | green | “once a question has been raised about the reasonableness of the attorney's fee under section 329, it is the attorney himself who bears the burden of establishing that the fee is reasonable.” | 4 |
| 3 | Dignity Health v. Seare (In re Seare) | green | “attorney is the expert and cannot rely upon a client's limited understanding of what constitutes 'complete' or 'necessary' information.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.