3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Heriberto Baldayaque v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heriberto Baldayaque v. United States Anchor | green | “the standard is not 'extreme diligence' or 'exceptional diligence,' it is reasonable diligence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Bernardo A. Torres v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the failure of a retained attorney to timely file a federal social security complaint does not necessarily constitute an 'extraordinary circumstance' warranting equitable tolling.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cole-Hill ex rel. T.W. v. Colvin | green | “application of the doctrine of equitable tolling is appropriate only in rare and exceptional circumstances in which a party is prevented in some extraordinary way from exercising his rights.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.