4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Huber.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Huber Anchor | green | “the district court did not clearly err in its factual determination that the high value of the laundered funds led to a base offense level that substantially overstated the seriousness of the offense” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Fred Cooper | green | “not necessary that the government prove that the defendants violated, or intended to violate a louisiana state legal duty, law rule or regulation” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Mark Hebert | green | “we have upheld a number of upward variances of similar and sometimes much greater magnitude.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Mansour Sanjar | green | “must affirm the verdict unless no rational juror could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.