4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas v. Chappell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas v. Chappell Anchor | green | “compare the evidence that actually was presented to the jury with that which could have been presented had counsel acted appropriately.” | 3 |
| 2 | Earl Cannedy, Jr. v. Darrel Adams | green | “whether it is reasonably likely the result would have been different” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Hardy | green | “if you find that this is a first degree murder and if you find that each one of these individuals hardy, morgan and reilly participated in that, either by aiding, abetting, by personally becoming involved, by encouraging, by soliciting, by aiding and abetting, each one of them i…” | 3 |
| 4 | Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan | green | “read the state court decision to comport with clearly established federal” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.