4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Jackson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Jackson Anchor | green | “it is fundamental that a statute should be so construed that no word, clause, sentence provision, or part thereof shall be rendered surplusage or superfluous.” | 3 |
| 2 | Martinez v. Public Emples Retirement Ass'n | neutral | “legislatures cannot predict all possible applications when drafting a statute” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Travis | green | “device designed or specially adapted to cause physical harm to persons or property by means of an explosion” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Dommer | green | “was not an 'explosive' as defined” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.