3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Interest of B.B..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Interest of B.B. Anchor | green | “on appeal, we review the files, records, and minutes or the transcript of the evidence, and we give appreciable weight to the findings of the juvenile court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Akerlind v. Buck | green | “a finding of fact is clearly erroneous under n.d.r.civ.p. 52(a) if there is no evidence to support it, if it is clear to the reviewing court that a mistake has been made, or if the finding is induced by an erroneous view of the law.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re JR | neutral | “is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for the child's physical, mental, or emotional health, or morals, and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the child's pare…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.