4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Estate of Conley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Estate of Conley Anchor | green | “we interpret uniform laws in a uniform manner, and we may seek guidance from decisions in other states which have interpreted similar provisions in a uniform law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Luke v. Stevenson | green | “one generally recognized rule of construction is that absent an expression of contrary intent, a gift made to persons identified by name and referred to by relationship is a gift to them individually and not as a class.” | 3 |
| 3 | Jordan v. Anderson | green | “to show what the testator meant by what he said, not to show what he intended to say.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jordan v. Anderson | green | “whether or not an ambiguity exists in a will is a question of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.