3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adelsperger v. Adelsperger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adelsperger v. Adelsperger Anchor | green | “custody decisions often hinge on subtle factors, such as the parents' demeanor and credibility during the proceedings.” | 5 |
| 2 | Curtis v. Hill | green | “falls outside the spectrum of rulings that might reasonably result from an application of the correct legal standards to the evidence found in the record.” | 4 |
| 3 | Curtis v. Hill | green | “a trial court's decision regarding custody or visitation should be set aside only when it 'falls outside the spectrum of rulings that might reasonably result from an application of the correct legal standards to the evidence found in the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.