3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co. Anchor | green | “it is axiomatic, that in most instances, ignorance of the law is no excuse, and every person is presumed to know the law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Luster v. Bank of Chelsea | green | “it is the totality of the circumstances and conditions of each individual case that determines if the constitutional requirements of due process are satisfied.” | 4 |
| 3 | Luster v. Bank of Chelsea | green | “where an action affects a person's interest in life, liberty or property such person is entitled to notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to be apprised of the pendency of the action and afforded an opportunity to present objections.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.