3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Offord v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offord v. State Anchor | green | “a comprehensive analysis in order to determine whether the crime falls within the category of both the most aggravated and the least mitigated of murders, thereby assuring uniformity in the application of the sentence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Anderson v. State | green | “this entails 'a qualitative review . . . of the underlying basis for each aggravator and mitigator rather than a quantitative analysis.” | 4 |
| 3 | Griffin v. State | green | “trial courts are required to consider all mitigating evidence presented by the defendant and supported by the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.