2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hansen v. Friend.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hansen v. Friend Anchor | green | “only if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from all of the evidence.” | 7 |
| 2 | Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological Society | green | “should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.