4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hay v. Hay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hay v. Hay Anchor | green | “a complaint must set forth sufficient facts to establish all necessary elements of a claim for relief.. . . so that the adverse party has adequate notice of the nature of the claim and relief sought.” | 3 |
| 2 | Medallion Development, Inc. v. Converse Consultants | green | “equitable indemnity is not applicable where the tortfeasors were in pari delicto, i.e., equally responsible for the loss.” | 3 |
| 3 | The Doctors Co. v. Vincent | green | “the 'might of one who has discharged a common liability to recover of another also liable, the aliquot portion which he ought to pay or bear.” | 3 |
| 4 | MacK v. Estate of MacK | green | “may take judicial notice of facts that are icjapable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned, so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.