4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Kelty.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Kelty Anchor | green | “a guilty plea relinquishes the right to assert a multiplicity claim when the claim cannot be resolved on the record.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Ziegler | green | “(1) all applicable statutory language; (2) the legislative history and context of the statutes; (3) the nature of the proscribed conduct; and (4) the appropriateness of multiple punishments for the conduct.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Ziegler | green | “the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment of the united states constitution and its parallel provision in the wisconsin constitution, article i, section 8(1), prohibit multiple punishments for the same offense.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Ziegler | green | “when a defendant is charged in more than one count for a single offense, the counts are deemed impermissibly multiplicitous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.