3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Christianson v. Downs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christianson v. Downs Anchor | green | “the situation is one where the common knowledge of laymen affords a basis for finding negligence.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gil v. Reed | green | “no expert testimony is needed when the symptoms exhibited are not beyond a layperson's grasp” | 4 |
| 3 | Hansen v. Board of Trustees of Hamilton Southeastern School Corp. | green | “the district court has broad discretion in deciding whether to retain supplemental claims” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.