4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Little Company of Mary Hospital v. Sebelius.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Little Company of Mary Hospital v. Sebelius Anchor | green | “confined to the administrative record.” | 5 |
| 2 | Little Company of Mary Hospital v. Sebelius | green | “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, unsupported by substantial evidence in the case, or not in accordance with law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ogbolumani v. Napolitano | green | “it's not enough that we might have reached a different conclusion; so long as a reasonable mind could find adequate support for the decision, it must stand.” | 2 |
| 4 | Ogbolumani v. Napolitano | green | “reasonable mind could find adequate support for the decision” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.