3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. State Anchor | green | “not to have a particular venire member on the jury if the venire member is challengeable for cause or the defendant exercises one of his peremptory challenges.” | 6 |
| 2 | Smith v. State | green | “a vague question about 'what things' the veniremember thought were important in determining whether an individual should receive a death sentence, wholly unrelated to the sentencing scheme, amounts to a fishing expedition going beyond the scope of proper voir dire.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gonzales v. State | green | “seek particular information from a particular panel member; rather, it presented a general topic for discussion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.