3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rattigan v. Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rattigan v. Gonzales Anchor | green | “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule and insult that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim's employment and create an abusive working environment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Pearsall v. Holder | green | “sufficiently demanding to ensure that title vii does not become a 'general civility code.” | 4 |
| 3 | Adesalu v. Copps | green | “while brady directs the district court's focus to the employer's proffered non-discriminatory reason, the court still first must determine whether plaintiff has suffered an adverse employment action.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.