4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Thomas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Thomas Anchor | green | “by statute abrogate the attorney general's constitutional grant of power” | 3 |
| 2 | Texas Orthopaedic Ass'n v. Texas State Board of Podiatric Medical Examiners | green | “no supporting statutory authority, the rule is void.” | 3 |
| 3 | In the Interest of Garcia | green | “with complete knowledge of existing law and with reference to it.” | 3 |
| 4 | Bullock v. Marathon Oil Co. | green | “if an agency interpretation is in effect at the time the legislature amends the law without making any substantial change in the statute, the legislature is deemed to have accepted the agency's interpretation” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.