4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Wilson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Wilson Anchor | green | “we view the facts in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling.” | 3 |
| 2 | Basaldua v. State | green | “we conclude that the imposition of conditions of probation that contain unconstitutional infringements of freedom of action constitutes a 'restraint' within the scope of habeas corpus relief.” | 3 |
| 3 | Winkfield v. State | green | “to the extent that an appellate record adequately shows that the trial judge and opposing counsel were aware of the substance of a defendant's objection, thereby meeting the purpose of an objection, an objection preserves the complaint for appellate review.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jordan v. State | green | “in this case the judgment of guilt is not independent of the trial court's ruling on the motion to suppress the evidence of the offense, and the judgment would not be supported without that evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.