4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doss v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doss v. State Anchor | green | “interviews with family members, and others familiar with an individual's typical behavior over an extended period of time in various settings, can supplement or aid in the interpretation of test results.” | 3 |
| 2 | Wiley v. State | green | “consider the entire record before it in deciding whether to grant an atkins hearing.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wiley v. State | green | “did not allege or establish that wiley is mentally retarded.” | 3 |
| 4 | Wiley v. State | green | “to expand on the procedure to be used in reaching a determination of mental retardation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.